Leading
the world in military spending and development, the decisions of America will
have a huge bearing on the wars of tomorrow. While the further development of
remote systems is a certainty, it’s important to look into the benefits and flaws
of these systems both from how the weapon works and how the operator works in
order to better plan our study and understanding of what needs to be done to
minimize the risks.
Historically
the use of robots in the military has primarily been beneficial to the
preservation of lives, with purposes such as scouting out landmines that
represent a risk both to soldiers and civilians, defending against missiles and
performing reconnaissance in hazardous scenarios. But recent years have seen an
upswing in the development and use of robots as remote controlled weapons.
Currently these systems rely on a
humans input before they shoot which has a mixture of benefits and risks. One
of the greatest benefits, asides from the lack of necessity to risk a soldier’s
life, is the reduction in stress a remote soldier goes through while deciding
on a course of action. Under life or death scenarios, stress can easily lead to
an increase in mistakes that cause injury or death to civilians or place their
comrades at risk. A con to remote warfare is that indirect killing doesn’t
register or process the same way that directly killing someone does in our
brain (Psychologist Kevin Dutton) which could lead to making it “easier” for
soldier’s to decide to kill when alternatives are available. While under some
circumstances being able to make a “necessary” kill without as much moral dilemma
and delay could be beneficial, without further study into this key decision
making difference, we further doubts on the entire process
One large concern regarding this
development is the possibility of completely autonomous robots. While many
missile defense systems are autonomous the risks of a robot designed to shoot
people being ran autonomously is a major global concern. Many current military
robots with automatic targeting systems could easily be changed from human
operated to automatic. The military benefits of this are miniscule and the
difficulty of and AI program capable of telling friends from foes with even
moderate accuracy and speed means that the likely hood of automatic
anti-personal robots being used any time soon by the military should be low.
No comments:
Post a Comment